• Skip to main content

OEC Action Fund

  • About
    • Mission + Vision + Values
    • Our Work
    • Staff
    • Board
  • Take Action
    • Past Actions
  • 2025 Endorsements
    • 2024 Endorsements
    • 2023 Endorsements
    • 2022 Endorsements
    • 2021 Endorsements
  • News & Updates
    • News
    • Testimony
    • Press Statements
    • Blog
  • Policy Scorecards
  • Donate

SB 137

May 30 2024

SB 137 Scorecard Letter to the Members of the Ohio Senate

Tuesday, April 23, 2024
To: Members of the Ohio Senate
From: Pete Bucher, Chief of Staff, Ohio Environmental Council Action Fund
Re: Senate Bill 137

Dear Honorable Senators,

I am writing to inform you that the Ohio Environmental Council (OEC) Action Fund will be scoring Senate Bill 137 (SB 137) for the purposes of our Legislative Scorecard for the 135th Ohio General Assembly. We urge a no vote on SB 137. To the extent that this bill passes, the OEC Action Fund will be doing extensive public education on the content and the votes on this legislation due to its restrictions on how local governments run their elections.

Local communities make a variety of decisions regarding how they structure their city councils, mayor races, and other elected offices, basing those decisions on the needs and wants of their constituents. Take for example, the Main Street Corridor right here in Central Ohio. Columbus’ City Council is made up of 9 district representatives. However, the entire city votes on the representatives for each district. Bexley has a 7 member, at-large council. Whitehall has a city council of 8 members: 4 ward members, 3 at large, and a council president. Ward members are selected only by residents of that ward. In a 9 mile stretch of Central Ohio road, there are 4 distinct municipal governments with unique makeups (to say nothing of townships). These at large seats are chosen by a “Choose up to 3 candidates” selection model.

Cuyahoga County also has a more complex county government, with an executive, while other counties have chosen to utilize different representative systems with county commissioners. All around, such diversity makes Ohio’s communities truly special. If a community in Ohio wants to explore an alternative voting system like Ranked Choice Voting, that community would simply be leaning into the power of such diversity with their democracy processes.

Local governments should not be penalized for choosing to utilize an alternative election system like Ranked Choice Voting, a system utilized successfully in a variety of communities across the country. While to our knowledge, no communities in Ohio have adopted Ranked Choice Voting, if a community were to consider it for their own elections, they shouldn’t have financial penalties hanging over their head when making that decision. Please, do not restrict the ability of Ohioans to choose the best leaders for their communities by making them choose between a voting method that might be better for their community and the financial security of those same communities. We urge you to vote no on SB 137.

If you have any questions, please direct them to Spencer Dirrig at sdirrig@theoec.org.

Sincerely,

Pete Bucher
Interim President OEC Action Fund

Written by

Feb 21 2024

SB 137 Opponent Testimony

February 21, 2024
Opponent Testimony – SB 137
Senate General Government Committee

Chairman Rulli, Vice-Chair Schuring, Ranking Member DeMora and members of the General Government Committee, thank you for the opportunity to provide opponent testimony today. My name is Franklin Davis. I am the Director of Climate and Democracy Organizing for the Ohio Environmental Council (OEC) Action Fund. The OEC Action Fund is dedicated to ensuring clean air, land, and water for all who call Ohio home. Ohioans who care about the environment know all too well the need for fair elections to ensure the voices of the people are heard. Our membership consists of people that span the entire state, from the Ohio River to Lake Erie, and they care passionately about the future of Ohio both for its environment and its future residents. To achieve these goals, every community, no matter their defining characteristics, must see themselves represented when they go to vote.

We lend our testimony today opposing Senate Bill (SB) 137. Simply put, we see no reason to restrict local governments from deciding how to run their elections. If a municipality wishes to utilize Ranked Choice Voting for their local elections, it should be permitted to do so.

Local communities make a variety of decisions regarding how they structure their city councils, mayor races, and other elected offices, basing those decisions on the needs and wants of their constituents. Take for example, the Main Street Corridor right here in Central Ohio. Columbus’ City Council is made up of 9 district representatives. However, the entire city votes on the representatives for each district. Bexley has a 7 member, at-large council. Whitehall has a city council of 8 members: 4 ward members, 3 at large, and a council president. Ward members are selected only by residents of that ward. In a 9 mile stretch of Central Ohio road, there are 4 distinct municipal governments with unique makeups (to say nothing of townships). These at large seats are chosen by a “Choose up to 3 candidates” selection model.

Cuyahoga County also has a more complex county government, with an executive, while other counties have chosen to utilize different representative systems with county commissioners.

All around, such diversity makes Ohio’s communities truly special. If a community in Ohio wants to explore an alternative voting system like Ranked Choice Voting, that community would simply be leaning into the power of such diversity with their democracy processes.

The Ohio Legislative Service Commission analysis of the bill states that it “allows a county or municipal corporation to use its home rule powers under the Ohio Constitution to adopt a Ranked Choice Voting system, but financially penalizes a local government that does so.” It also “makes a county or municipal corporation that approves the use of Ranked Choice Voting via a resolution or ordinance ineligible to receive distributions from the Local Government Fund until it rescinds the resolution or ordinance.”

Local governments should not be penalized for choosing to utilize an alternative election system like Ranked Choice Voting, a system utilized successfully in a variety of communities across the country. While to our knowledge, no communities in Ohio have adopted Ranked Choice Voting, if a community were to consider it for their own elections, they shouldn’t have financial penalties hanging over their head when making that decision.

Please, do not restrict the ability of Ohioans to choose the best leaders for their communities by making them choose between a voting method that might be better for their community and the financial security of those same communities.

It is my sincere hope that the constitutional values that I hold dear, such as home rule and the will of the people being reflected, will be valued by our legislature and that this bill and others like it will be rejected.
Chairman Rulli, members of the committee thank you again for the chance to provide testimony on SB 137 today. I’m happy to answer any questions if you have them.

Respectfully submitted,

Franklin Davis
Director of Climate & Democracy Organizing
Ohio Environmental Council Action Fund
fdavis@theoec.org

Written by

OEC Action Fund
Sign Up Donate
  • About
  • Take Action
  • News
  • Policy Scorecards