• Skip to main content

OEC Action Fund

  • About
    • Mission + Vision + Values
    • Our Work
    • Staff
    • Board
  • Take Action
    • Past Actions
  • 2025 Endorsements
    • 2024 Endorsements
    • 2023 Endorsements
    • 2022 Endorsements
    • 2021 Endorsements
  • News & Updates
    • News
    • Testimony
    • Press Statements
    • Blog
  • Policy Scorecards
  • Donate

135th Ohio General Assembly

Dec 06 2023

SB 83 Scorecard Letter to the Members of the Ohio House

December 6, 2023

To: Members of the Ohio House of Representatives
From: Pete Bucher, Chief of Staff, Ohio Environmental Council Action Fund
Re: Senate Bill 83

Dear Honorable Representatives,

I am writing to inform you that the Ohio Environmental Council (OEC) Action Fund will be scoring Senate Bill 83 for the purposes of our Legislative Scorecard for the 135th Ohio General Assembly. We urge a no vote on Senate Bill 83. To the extent that SB 83 passes, the OEC Action Fund will be doing extensive public education on the content and the votes on this legislation due to its negative impact on Ohio’s higher education.

Senate Bill 83 impacts Ohio’s 14 public universities, 23 public community colleges, and a few private institutions. It would limit the institution’s ability to take a stance on a “controversial belief or policy,” meaning any belief or policy determined to be “subject of political controversy.” In this determination, the legislative text notes that this includes electoral politics, foreign policy, diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, abortion, immigration policy, marriage, and climate change. Furthermore, Senate Bill 83 would restrict training, professional development, or hiring to learn about these aforementioned topics.

The OEC Action Fund finds that the passage of Senate Bill 83 would be incredibly harmful to higher education across the state. Students, professors, and staff are affected most directly by this stark overhaul in education policy in Ohio. Under this legislation, institutions are forced to encourage students, faculty, and staff to reach their own conclusions on “controversial matters” while chilling programs around the facts, discussion, or spaces designed to cultivate critical thinking and learning. The legislation greatly limits academic freedom of both students and professors, and, in turn, hurts the opportunity for collective learning on social injustices we see today in our state and across the country.

Senate Bill 83 would also eliminate a public college or university’s ability to create climate action plans and implement sustainability goals. Lines 229 -236 detail that institutions of higher education and their boards cannot “endorse, oppose, comment, or take action, as an institution, on the public policy controversies of the day, or any other ideology, principle, concept, or formulation that requires commitment to any controversial belief or policy, specified concept, or specified ideology.” As written, this could prevent major institutions from taking action on sustainability or climate that saves universities money while improving public health and air quality. Climate action plans are important to outlining long-term steps toward decarbonization and comprehensively eliminating greenhouse gas emissions, while supporting communities along the way. Eliminating these emissions at institutions is just another way Ohio can continue to reduce its greenhouse gas footprint as one of the country’s top polluters.

The OEC Action Fund sees Senate Bill 83 as a threat to developing equitable solutions to climate change that confront environmental racism and protect the health and safety of all who call Ohio home. Whether it is about climate change or other issues named as “controversial beliefs or policies,” we should encourage thoughtful, critical discussion on campuses rather than discouraging it. We urge you to vote “no” on Senate Bill 83.

If you have any questions, please email me at pbucher@theoec.org.

Sincerely,
Pete Bucher

Chief of Staff
OEC Action Fund

Written by

Nov 29 2023

SB 83 Opponent Testimony

Ohio House Higher Education Committee
Chair, Tom Young
Vice Chair, Gayle Manning
SB 83 Opponent Testimony
Wednesday November 29th, 2023

Thank you Chair Young, Vice Chair Manning, and Ranking Member Miller for the opportunity to provide written testimony in opposition of Senate Bill 83: Ohio Higher Education Enhancement Act. The OEC Action Fund’s mission is to protect and enhance the environment and the health of all Ohio communities by working to secure healthy air, land, water and democracy.

Senate Bill 83 impacts Ohio’s 14 public universities, 23 public community colleges, and a few private institutions. It would limit the institution’s ability to take a stance on a “controversial belief or policy,” meaning any belief or policy that is determined to be “subject of political controversy.” In this determination, the legislative text notes that this includes electoral politics, foreign policy, diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, abortion, immigration policy, marriage, and climate change. Furthermore, Senate Bill 83 would restrict training, professional development, or hiring to learn about these aforementioned topics.

The OEC Action Fund finds that the passage of Senate Bill 83 would be incredibly harmful to higher education across the state. Students, professors, and staff are affected most directly by this stark overhaul in education policy in Ohio. Under this legislation, institutions are forced to encourage students, faculty, and staff to reach their own conclusions on “controversial matters” while chilling programs around the facts, discussion, or spaces designed to cultivate critical thinking and learning. The legislation greatly limits academic freedom of both students and professors, and in turn, hurts the opportunity for collective learning on social injustices we see today in our state and across the country.

There are a number of spillover consequences outside of higher education that would ensue if Senate Bill 83 were passed. Restricting discussion or positions on “controversial matters” such as climate change, or even climate change policy, prevents the much-needed critical thinking and education that is needed to both comprehend and combat the climate crisis. Climate change, nor the policy designed to address it, should not be considered a political controversy. We need continued public education on climate change if we are to develop sound, pragmatic, and creative solutions to address the climate crisis. This also necessitates an understanding of how structural disadvantages and systemic racism have left communities of color, low income folks, and people with disabilities most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change.

Senate Bill 83 would also eliminate a public college or university’s ability to create climate action plans and implement sustainability goals. Lines 229 -236 detail that institutions of higher education and their boards cannot “endorse, oppose, comment, or take action, as an institution, on the public policy controversies of the day, or any other ideology, principle, concept, or formulation that requires commitment to any controversial belief or policy, specified concept, or specified ideology.” As written, this could prevent major institutions from taking action on sustainability or climate that saves universities money while improving public health and air quality. Climate action plans are important to outlining long-term steps toward decarbonization and comprehensively eliminating greenhouse gas emissions, while supporting communities along the way. Eliminating these emissions at institutions is just another way Ohio can continue to reduce its greenhouse gas footprint as one of the country’s
top polluters.

Climate change is already impacting the daily lives of Ohioans, whether by affecting public health, critical infrastructure, weather patterns, or the environment directly. Rather than politicizing it, we should collectively work together to protect our collective environmental and human rights for all. There is no questioning that the climate crisis is underway, and aiming to prevent discussion on this major issue of our lifetimes in Ohio’s higher education system denies the large archive of research that proves it true. It also refutes the lived realities of those across the states who have already dealt with extreme flooding, severe weather, and record temperatures in their communities. Students will be witnessing the impacts of climate change intensify during their lifetimes. They will be our future leaders working to build a safe, sustainable future for all.

The OEC Action Fund sees Senate Bill 83 as a threat developing equitable solutions to climate change that confront environmental racism and protect the health and safety of all who call Ohio home. Whether it is about climate change or the other issues named in as a “controversial belief or policy,” we should be encouraging thoughtful, critical discussion on campuses, rather than discouraging it.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide written testimony today on this important issue to protect higher education and fight climate change.

Sincerely,

Pete Bucher
Chief of Staff
Ohio Environmental Council Action Fund

Written by

Jun 21 2023

HB 79 Scorecard Letter to the Members of the Ohio House

June 21st, 2023

To: Members of the Ohio House
From: Pete Bucher, Chief of Staff, OEC Action Fund
Re: House Bill 79

Dear Honorable Representatives,

I am writing to inform you that the Ohio Environmental Council (OEC) Action Fund will be scoring House Bill 79 (HB 79) for the purposes of our Legislative Scorecard for the 135th Ohio General Assembly. We urge a Yes vote on HB 79. To the extent that HB 79 passes, the OEC Action Fund will be doing extensive public education on the content and the votes on this legislation due to its positive impact to Ohio’s environment and the health of Ohioans.

HB 79 is a top energy policy priority for the OEC Action Fund. It rectifies the damage done by House Bill 6, and creates much-needed energy waste reduction (or energy efficiency) programs that are voluntary for both consumers and utilities. Thanks to HB 6, Ohioans have been without energy waste reduction programs that help reduce their energy consumption and energy bills for nearly four years. We appreciate that HB 79 recognizes that HB 6 went too far and that this bipartisan bill would restore such programs for Ohio residential customers and small businesses. Among the chief benefits of reinstating these programs are combating air pollution by reducing energy waste, reducing strain on the electric grid, and lowering energy bills for Ohioans. This legislation will allow utilities, with PUCO and stakeholder oversight, to create consumer and business friendly programs that will save consumers money on their electric bills while also improving air quality and public health. To be clear: this bill will save Ohioans money in a time of skyrocketing energy bills.

HB 79 also has a myriad of other benefits not provided by current utility, state, or local initiatives. This bill specifically targets support to lower income families and seeks to make efficiency technology affordable to them. The technologies supported will be specifically chosen to ensure they are not already included in the Inflation Reduction Act, and can start being rolled out as soon as the program is started. The impact of the bill will be immediate, reducing strain on our electricity grid as less energy is used and creating jobs for Ohioans to install the technology. Overall, HB 79 is a win for all parties involved.

At the center of HB 79 is the choice for consumers to either opt in or opt out of these energy efficiency programs. These standards are not forced upon consumers and businesses. Instead, lowered prices and economic incentives are being used to push people toward more efficient energy usage. Safeguards have been put in place to ensure that both consumers and businesses can opt out of the program if they so choose.

We are at a critical point in the fight against climate change. The energy waste reduction programs that will be allowed under HB 79 are necessary for reducing our energy consumption and for our shift toward clean energy sources, all the while benefiting Ohioans. For our health, our environment, and for our wallets, it is critical that these energy waste production programs are put back in place to undo the misstep of HB 6. HB 79 will create jobs, create a more resilient electrical grid, and improve our air quality and public health. For these reasons, the OEC Action Fund urges members of the Ohio House of Representatives to Pass HB 79.

If you have any questions, please contact me at pbucher@theoec.org.

Sincerely,
Pete Bucher

Interim President OEC Action Fund

Written by

Apr 12 2023

HJR 1, SJR 2, HB 144, SB 92 Scorecard Letter to the 135th General Assembly

April 13, 2023

To: Members of the Ohio General Assembly
From: Pete Bucher, Chief of Staff, Ohio Environmental Council Action Fund
Re: OEC Action Fund Urges a NO Vote on HJR 1, SJR 2, HB 144, SB 92

Dear Honorable Legislators,

I am writing to inform you that the Ohio Environmental Council (OEC) Action Fund will be scoring the following legislation for the purposes of our Legislative Scorecard for the 135th Ohio General Assembly:
● House Joint Resolution (HJR) 1
● Senate Joint Resolution (SJR) 2
● House Bill (HB) 144
● Senate Bill (SB) 92

We urge a NO vote on all four. To the extent that any of these pieces of legislation pass, the OEC
Action Fund will be doing extensive public education on the content and the votes on this legislation
due to its detrimental impact to Ohioans’ right to direct democracy and the ballot initiative process, and
subsequently its indirect impact to Ohio’s environment and the health of Ohioans.

HJR 1 and SJR 2 are an attempt to silence the power of Ohioans through the ballot initiative process. Over the past two decades, less than twenty citizen-initiated ballot initiatives have been proposed before Ohioans, and only five have been approved. Ohioans already rarely approve these sorts of proposals—they are reluctant to change the Ohio Constitution. There’s no need to change what isn’t broken.

SB 92 and HB 144 are being used as an anti-democratic vehicle for HJR 1/SJR 2. After the Ohio General Assembly effectively ended August special elections last year, the proposed August special election through SB 92/HB 144 is a blatant attempt to place HJR 1/SJR 2 on the ballot during an election few Ohioans will know is happening.

SB 92 and HB 144 are simply a waste of taxpayer dollars and a waste of Ohio’s electoral resources all in the service of a fundamentally misguided constitutional amendment.

Ohioans chose, back in 1912, to have 50% of voters approve constitutional amendments. They also required a ballot initiative to gather signatures equal to 10% of the electorate in the last gubernatorial election. The signature gathering requirements for constitutional amendments themselves are the onerous requirement—it costs millions of dollars to fund signature gathering efforts. Yet regardless of who funds a particular signature gathering campaign, every signature must be from an Ohioan registered to vote in this state.

Once an issue is on the ballot, the legislative authority in that moment now rests with the people, as
established by the Ohio Constitution
. If Ohioans want to enshrine particular policies, programs, or
other issues directly into the Ohio Constitution, that is their inherent right as stated in the Preamble and Article I, Section 2.

If HJR 1 and/or SJR 2 is referred to the ballot, Ohioans will defeat it. They will not give away their own democratic authority. So rather than waste money, time, and resources on a protracted campaign on both sides, we should end the discussion now, shelving this supposed “solution” for a problem that does not even exist.

For these reasons and more, without significant amendments to proactively enhance Ohioans’ right to
direct democracy, we urge a NO vote on all four pieces of legislation.

If you have any questions, please direct them to me, Pete Bucher at pbucher@theoec.org.

Sincerely,
Pete Bucher

Chief of Staff, OEC Action Fund

Written by

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
OEC Action Fund
Sign Up Donate
  • About
  • Take Action
  • News
  • Policy Scorecards